
There are other notions of Dostoevsky's, ones that I'd say were Mormon in character, but again, I am no theologian. In Dostoevsky's time, there were a people called "Russian Mormons, " but their origins indicate they are not likely associated with American Latter-day Saints. Missions representing the American Saints, for their part, arguably did not tackle the great expanse of Russia, although Dostoevsky might well have run into a few in Europe during his gambling days. Waves of missionaries were sent to Europe for recruiting purposes beginning in 1837, however, mainly to the British Isles and Scandanavia. In any event, the Book of Mormon was not translated into Russian until 1980, but French and German versions were available in 1852, when Dostoevsky was still in Semipalatinsk. One would like to think that if such material came across his path, he would be interested in it, too, as he was very curious, reading the Koran along with Kant. He also had an interest in America - he loved Poe, he cites Fenimore Cooper in the closing pages of "Brothers." However, that is a Mormon trail that's hard to follow. What, then, is Mormon about "The Brothers Karamazov"? In the opening passages to "The Grand Inquisitor," Ivan talks about the days when the Madonna, saints, Christ and God himself were brought to earth in poetry and play, and even quotes Tyutchev, the poet: "Bent under the burden of the Cross; The King of Heaven in the form of a slave/Walked the length and breadth of you,/blessing you, my native land" (248). Then Ivan's story of Jesus visiting Spain during the Inquisition begins. As anyone knows, the Book of Mormon's biggest message is that Jesus came to America and walked among men after he rose from the dead. This small, revolutionary, proposal is why most Christians call Mormons heretics. Mormon theology also allows for a spiritual progression from man to god. To Christians in the west, this sound heretical. But to an Orthodox believer, perhaps not so. (Click here for Natasha's theological cheat sheet.)
With relief, I turn to Lee D. Johnson's essay, "Struggle for Theosis: Smerdyakov as Would-Be Saint" in Jackson's fine anthology of essays. Theosis is "central to Orthodox theology and crucial to the religious thematics of 'The Brothers Karamazov' on the whole. This concept . . . the Orthodox belief that human beings are capable of partaking in the very divinity of God, that such participation is, in fact, the end goal of all Christians. As the fourth-century saint Athanasius summarizes, 'For He was made man that we might be made God.' Originally, the doctrine of theosis, or deification, was sternly distinguished by Eastern church fathers from the seemingly similar but originally pagan concept of apotheosis, whereby a human being does not so much share God's divinity as become god himself. Indeed, the doctrinal battles that gave birth to the Seven Ecumenical Councils (the councils that form the backbone of the Eastern Orthodox Church) were primarily concerned with achieving precise Trinitarian and christological formulas, carefully balanced definitions that would, on the one hand, preserve the possibility of theosis without, on the other, opening the door for any heretical tendancy . . . that resembled the pagan concept of apotheosis. Dostoevsky, well read in patristic literature, incorporates these religious conceptual battles into the thematic structure of his novel . . ." (75). The Eastern Orthodox church's struggle over man's potential for divinity also finds expression in historical and contemporary Mormon thought, as evidenced by this article originally published in "Dialogue, A Journal of Mormon Thought."

Photo credit: 1) William Blake, "The Marriage of Heaven and Hell" frontispiece, 1790-1793, from kaliope.com. 2) Paul Kline, Montgomery County Mormon Temple at Dusk, from Montgomery County, MD 13th annual photo contest on the county website.